No feedback or proof from the National HQ - proves they steal funds

I gave the Knights Party National HQ 7 days to provide proof of where their funds go to. Well, it's been way longer then 7 days and no proof. Of course you and I both know they steal and misuse funds. The proof is simple, they were to chicken to answer us. If you had proof, would you not come forward and show it? And yes, they do read this blog. We know because we get death threats and silly comments from their members weekly. Once again, the Knights Party proves they are frauds!!

Be gone 7-10 days

My wife and I are on our way to Europe. I will be gone between 7-10 days. Thanks for all the great feedback from all the people out there. And thanks for all the insane lack of common sense threats from the members of the Knights' Party, the biggest scam and fraud the white movement has ever seen. Be back soon. Until then, 83!!

To Thom Robb and National HQ

We are calling you out.

1) We want proof of where all monthly donations go. You claim they go to the white race. Really? Then show us what you spend monthly donations on. Other groups show proof of where their monthly donations go. If they can, so can you. We will give you 7 days to provide us the proof. If not, it proves to us you are pocketing all the money.

2) At HQ, you have over 40 bricks you sold to members for $350 each. Can you show proof of where this money went besides your back pocket?

We will give you 7 days to answer. If not, we take this as proof you steal movement funds. Other groups inform members where their money goes. If they can, so can you.

A Knights' Party member speaks out: Guess Thom Robb takes anyone like we've said all along

Staff - Wow, just wow. Man, where does Thom Robb find these people? Wait, he never turns down an application. Here is an e-mail from one of his members. Too funny. Read the pure retardation of this moron.

Staff what staff... I have $500 says you wont meet rpersentatives in person to deliver that so called information you have....we have proof in the pudding your a liar....which is slanderous and there fore punnishable by laws of the state which you are posting in. Come clean and we will not prosecute! -Maximous

Staff - First off, what is a rpersentatives? I've never seen that word in my life. Second, I am waiting on his so-called proof that we are liars. Below are some of the facts we've proved that cannot be a lie.

1) Don Black, former leader of the Knights' Party did break into the office of another White Nationalist.

2) David Duke, a former leader of the Knights' Party was caught on tape selling his KKK membership list to a FBI agent.

3) Thom Robb has never provided proof or a bill of where his 40 plus bricks at $350 apiece income has went to.

4) Randy Gray is a high school dropout.

5) The Knights' Party did lie about units that don't exist.

6) The Knights' Party does sell people rank.

And of course I could go on and on. But as you can tell, I proved my point. I also have another question for this idiot that e-mailed us here, what is "punnishable"?

Members of the Knights' Party upset with our blog

In the past three days dozens of threats have been made against the staff here at Christian Frauds. Members of the Knights' Party have threaten us with violence, reporting us to Google (oh well, we have a back up blog at wordpress) and with the FBI (typical of members of theirs to work with FEDS - recall Randy Gray worked with Hal Turner who was recently outed as an FBI informer).

1) Threatening me with violence does very little. Actually, it makes me want to work on this blog even more than I already do.

2) Contact Google. This blog makes fun of a KKK group. LOL, do you think Google cares? I am shocked they aren't helping me write this blog.

3) Call the FBI. It's not illegal to point out facts and post the comments of others, unless that data is copyrighted. It's also not illegal for people to post their comments in the comment section. If someone wants to write Thom Robb is a conman, they have that right - its called free speech.

If you people don't like this blog, oh well. Your shouldn't belong to a group that does nothing. We want one thing on this blog to be proven a lie. Until then, shut up. We have offered $50 for anything to be proven a lie here. And yet, no one has taken us up on our challenge. Instead, we are threaten with attacks and nasty comments. Very typical of the "Christians" who make up the phony Knights' Party.

Again I ask you all the following questions -

1) Where was Thom Robb and the Knights' Party during Jena 6?

2) Where was Thom Robb and the Knights' Party during the Black on White Norfolk attack?

3) Where was Thom Robb and the Knights' Party during Pitts and his "cry me a river" comment?

4) Where was Thom Robb and the Knights' Party during Knoxville 1 and 2?

5) Where was Thom Robb and the Knights' Party during the time their Kansas member was exposed by a reporter?

We will also ask these questions again -

1) Why does the Knights' Party allow black state leaders?

2) Why does the Knights' Party allow news reporters to join and expose their members?

3) Why does the Knights' Party allow a dog to join?

Don Black: Keynote speaker at the Knights' Party Faith and Freedom Conference

This can be found on the main page at www.kkk.com. For a group which claims to be Christian, one would think they could do better than Don Black, a known conman and thief. Black has a past of stealing from others, selling drugs and ripping other whites off. You refresh your memory here at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don_Black_(white_nationalist) and http://christianfrauds.blogspot.com/2008/01/leadership-of-knights-party.html.

I wonder will Thom Robb and Rachel Pendergraft tell their members about Black's past such as breaking into the offices of fellow white nationalists, selling drugs, helping Duke out with his cocaine and hooker past and stealing movement cash?

Child slave labor at the Knights Party HQ ?

I find it sick when people use their children to make a quick buck. That idea alone is Jewish in nature.

Look at April Gadee of the National Alliance. That whore forced her children into making music. She didn't care that they were being exposed to child molesting perverts such as Kevin Strom, Matt Downey or John Justice. All April saw was dollar signs. The well being of her children meant nothing.

After doing some research, it seems Thom Robb is doing the same with his teen age grand-daughters.

First off, here is their website, http://heritageconnection.tv/.

Second, read their blog, http://www.heritageconnectionband.blogspot.com/. Is it just me or does it look like every blog is being coached? What I mean is, it seems like like they are talking like robots. They are saying what they are told to say by someone else. That is the feeling I get. You read and make up your own mind.

Third, take a look at the gift shop, http://www.ozarkcrafts.net/music.htm. Like April, the Knights Party are using underage children against their will to make a quick buck - sick.

Fourth, look at this link, http://heritageconnection.tv/About.htm. Nice that they post pictures of their underage kids for any sick pervert to download. But then again, what should we expect from the leadership of the Knights' Party? Anyway they can make a quick dollar is okay in their eyes.

Jessica Gray: Admits that dogs can join the Knights Party

Seen above is Jessica while she stares down the pot roast and cake.

Staff - It amazes me how people will deny things then turn around and openly admit it later on down the road. for months Jessica Gray claimed a "dog" was not part of the Knights Party.


Taken from http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=64562



Although it is off topic, I find it interesting that your members have soooo much free time and money that they can join other groups to troll and surf their web boards just to create problems. Says quite about about your member's charcter. Maybe I should sign up for the ANSWP under my dogs name, or maybe just one I pull out of the phone book. - Jessica Gray


Staff - She admits she may sign up for the ANSWP to return the favor since they did that to the Knights Party. One problem, Bill White does background checks and doesn't live off of movement money like Thom Robb...
__________________

Too funny: A must read

When John and Ed Kundrot quit, so did 25 other members of the Knights Party in the Boston area. Thom Robb, Rachel Pendergraft and a handful of members claimed they were drunks and informers. Soon the lies and gossip spread. Of course this was pure slander, something the Knights Party and their membership does very well. What is funny is, I found links of stories at www.kkk.com that John Kundrot, a so-called informer wrote.

Now, if you ran a pro-white group, would you promote the work of an FBI informer? I am guessing you would not. Of course John Kundrot is no more an FBI informer than Andy Haskins is sober (Indiana State Leader). Below are some links to the "Informer" and his writing.

http://www.kkk.bz/white_teachers_need_not_apply.htm

http://www.kkk.bz/cleaning_up_your_room.htm


Amazing a group would have aritcles posted by a "FBI informer". Of course like I've already stated, John and his family are not informers. This is nothing but pure slander by the Knights Party. This is a common method by them against ex-members who expose them. Below are a list of ex-members who expose them and the lies they tell on them.

Ron Edwards - Robb claims he is a drunk. Ron is not.

rv311 - (not sure of his real name) Robb claims he is a drunk. He is not.

Michael Burks - Randy Gray claims he is gay. He is not.

John Kundrot - Robb claims he is a FBI informer. He is not.

Ed Kundrot - Robb claims he is a drunk. Ed is not.

As you can tell, they lie about all ex-members who expose them.

"Leadership" of the Knights Party

David Duke – Duke was a conman who led the Knights Party from 1976-1981. He tried to rip Dr. Pierce off in 1976 over a story that Pierce wrote. Duke was known to cheat on his wife and steal movement funds. Tom Metzger was one of the first to openly expose Duke as the fraud he was. In 1981, Duke was caught on film selling his KKK membership to the Imperial Wizard of the Invisible Empire – who was an FBI informer. Duke also admitted to drinking and gambling problems. Much of this was bought and paid for with movement money. Duke was sent to jail a few years back for stealing movement money. He was not set-up by Jews like the Stormfront crew claims. Since that time, Duke fame in the United States has disappeared. That is why he spends all his time in Europe where his lying and conman ways are little known.

Don Black – By age 16, Black was breaking into fellow White Nationalist’s offices stealing membership lists. He along with a group of Duke supporters tried to take over an Island for what they claim was “A white homeland”. In reality, they were setting up a racketeering scam to sell drugs, pimp out hookers and gambling. This illegal made money would fund Duke and his “president” campaign. Black then founded Stormfront and has ripped people off ever since. He backs pro-Jewish groups such as the BNP and the CCC – two groups that allow non-white and Jewish membership.

Thom Robb – Since 1989, Thom “The Robber” has been ripping people off. He has ripped people off with “hot line” fund-raisers and brick scams. During his rule non-whites, FBI informers, reporters and even a dog have all joined. His group does nothing besides throw fliers in people’s yards and run a public access show begging for money. Thom has done away with the ‘Grand Council” and replaced with his family members. The Knights Party is a family run business to simply support Thom and his family. Again, we ask the following questions since Robb claims to be a “spokesman” for our people –

1 – Where was he during Jena 6?

2- Where was he during the Norfolk attack?

3 – Where was he in Knoxville?

4- Where was he at against Pitts?

5- Where was he when his Kansas member was exposed by a reporter?

I guess he was busy counting his $350 bricks and laughing his way to the bank.

Michael Burks and Pastor Visser expose the Knights Party and their membership

This was the best ANSWP show of all time as far as I'm concerned. Out of all the shows with Bill White and Von, I'd take this show over any of them any day.

The Knights Party and many of their members are exposed with great detail and fact -

1) Learn about the $350 brick scam by Thom Robb

2) Learn all the lies and slander committed by Randy and Jessica Gray

3) Non-white members of the Knights Party

4) FBI membership in the Knights Party

5) News reporters openly join and expose members while the leadership does nothing

6) Mark and Debbie Downey teach Talmudic views over Christian views

7) The Drunk members of the Knights Party are exposed

And so much more. If you have not heard this show, please listen here http://vonbluvens.org/answpsh010808.mp3. People, you need to know the truth about such frauds. These people are not for the white race. Read over this blog. The leadership or members of the Knights Party cannot prove anything here to be a lie or false. Instead, they use slanderous attacks against us. Again, we will offer them $50 for anything they can prove to be false here. So far they have not taken us up on our bet which we challenged them over with two months ago.

Why? Because, they are frauds with no truth in them!

More proof Randy Gray/Knights Party of Michigan were allies with an FBI informer

Everyone remember all the shit we took for protesting him atKalamazoo.
Frankly, a good number of “white supremacist” events in this countryin the past five years have been organized, initiated, or led by theFBI, and I wonder sometimes how much of the movement is simply agovernment front.
—–
Hate-monitoring group: Turner was FBI informant
By Paul BrooksTimes Herald-RecordJanuary 17, 2008Hal Turner stalked in front of Kingston High School with his neo-Nazisupporters in 2005, tossing white-power taunts at counter-demonstrators.
That was just part of his legacy. He railed against President Bushand Jews, too. He handed out the private addresses of New JerseySupreme Court justices.
But some government agencies are OK if you work for them — and Turnerapparently did.
He was an FBI informant, according to the Southern Poverty LawCenter, a group that monitors hate groups and extremists.
According to the center, hackers confronted Turner on his Web siteJan. 1 and told him they had broken into Turner’s computer server.
What they found were e-mails between Turner and an FBI agent who wasapparently Turner’s handler. The unidentified hackers posted a July 7e-mail to the agent. In it, Turner gave the agent a message fromsomeone threatening to kill Sen. Russ Feingold, Democrat ofWisconsin, the center said in a story on its Web site,www.splcenter.org.
“Once again,” Turner wrote to the agent, “my fierce rhetoric hasserved to flush out a possible crazy.”
When the e-mails hit a neo-Nazi Web site, Turner shut down his ownWeb site. “I hereby separate from the “pro-White” movement. I will nolonger involve myself in any aspect of it,” Turner said.
Yesterday, Turner said the only thing he can say about the FBIallegation is “no comment.” The FBI hasn’t commented, either.
The center’s Mark Potok didn’t object to the FBI’s use of informantsin general. “There is no question these are groups in many, manycases that really do need infiltrating, but … this goes way overthe line. It is like a game of Russian roulette and we are the bait.”
Kingston Mayor Jim Sottile was dumbfounded by the revelation ofTurner’s FBI informant status. “You can’t make this stuff up,” themayor said.
Maybe Turner was acting all the time, Sottile said. “But it wasn’t anact when he had this whole community in an uproar and cost us$80,000.”

Non-White allies of the Knights Party

The above picture is that of Sonny Landham. He is of American Indian blood. His bio is here, http://www.sonnylandham.com/bio.cfm. Landham also made some porn movies back in the late 1970's. He is a current member for Gordon Baum's CCC.

Baum and his group are close friends of Thom Robb. Robb has been on their radio show in the past and has even allowed them to attend and speak at his railles.

When did the Klan become pro-non-white? When did the Klan tolerate porn stars? This never took place in Klan history until Thom Robb gave it the okay.

Yes ladies and gentleman, Thom Robb is allies with trash. Ex Asian porn stars are nice allies in the eyes of Thom Robb. And you still think Robb is a good Christian?

Owner of www.kkklan.com calls Thom Robb a conman

1950's-90's
Calling card, large "KKK" in red. Solicits joining Thom Robb's "klan". Thom Robb is a notorious con artist who impersonates the Klan. ...www.kkklan.com/modern2.htm - 50k - Cached - Similar pages

Thom Robb's mentor - an odd ball Commie who hung out with Scientology people

For years Thom Robb studied under the (ex)Commie, Kenneth Goff. This alone is enough proof of why Robb should never be trusted. Not only was Goff a commie, the man seemed to be very mentally ill. He claims to have wrote books that he had nothing to do with. Below is some fun facts about the mental state of this man. Taken from http://www.cesnur.org/2005/brainwash_13.htm.


Still mentioned today, and the subject matter of considerable controversy, is a document published in the 1950s, when, one after the other, several different editions were published of a book known as Brain-Washing: A Synthesis of the Russian Textbook of Psychopolitics. The book is, ostensibly, a summary of manuals circulating in the Soviet Union, allegedly written by the chief of the secret police, Lavrenti Beria (1899-1953).
The text opens with a discourse by Beria addressed to “American students at the Lenin University ”. It goes on by stating some key ideas of dialectical and historical materialism, before examining “psychopolitics” in itself. It suggests creating in the victims an “artificial exhaustion” through drugs and pain, before “implanting” communist doctrines through hypnosis. The process is presented under the name PDH, “pain-drug hypnosis”[1]. In the 1950s a frequent objection to brainwashing theories was that, according to academic hypnologists, ultimately an individual in hypnotic trance would not perform acts radically contrary to his or her will and best interests. The “Manual” claims that this objection in fact comes from communist propaganda: “It is in the interest of Psychopolitics that population be told that an hypnotized person will not do anything against his actual will, will not commit immoral acts, and will not act so as to endanger himself. While this may be true of light, parlour hypnotism, it certainly is not true of commands implanted with the use of electric shocks, drugs, or heavy punishment”[2]. The booklet then relates brainwashing to a larger picture, where two main dangers for the communists are indicated: American individualism (to be substituted, through brainwashing, by a form of group thinking), and religion.
The “Manual” was reprinted some twenty times, and quoted even more often; it played an important role in the discussion on brainwashing. The question of its authorship remains controversial. A curious character, Kenneth Goff (1909-1972), constantly claimed that he was the one who compiled it. Goff was a member of the U.S. Communist Party in the 1903s. He later converted to Fundamentalist Protestantism, only to evolve later towards anti-Semitism, neo-Nazism, and Identity Churches [3]. In the 1940s and 1950s Goff published several autobiographical books and pamphlets, where he graphically described both his conversion and his previous “conditioning” as an American communist by Soviet agents[4]. In 1955, the “Manual” (without mentioning Goff at all) was published by the Church of Scientology, with the indication “Published as a public service by the Church of Scientology”, and with an “editorial note” signed by a professor Charles Stickley, about whom no information is available (in all the other editions, there is also an “editorial note”, but Goff is indicated as its author)[5]. Both the early Goff edition, and the edition published by Scientology, include references to Christian Science and Dianetics as groups that Communist psychopolitics should try to discredit; the Goff version also includes Pentecostals, not mentioned in the Scientology edition.
Critics of Scientology have no doubt that the book was authored by Lafayette Ronald (“L. Ron”) Hubbard (1911-1986), the founder of both Dianetics and Scientology. For example, Bent Corydon is very positive when he claims, based on a statement by Hubbard’s son L. Ron Hubbard Jr. (Ron DeWolf, 1934-1991), that “Dad wrote every word of it”, having apparently been influenced by John Sanborn (1922-) who at the time assisted Hubbard in editing his works[6]. (Subsequently, DeWolf was to state under oath that Corydon had incorrectly quoted many of his statements.) This version has been repeated by countless anti-Scientology works, and has been even quoted as a “confession” by Hubbard that he did indeed know about brainwashing.
In fact, it is alleged by critics, Hubbard discussed brainwashing in several other works, thus “confessing” that he was capable of using it. The latter argument is somewhat contradictory. In fact, Hubbard’s works expose brainwashing as something that should not be practiced, not only for moral reasons, but also because, in Hubbard’s system, brainwashing represents all that Scientology regards as reprehensible and harmful in modern psychiatry. The practice of brainwashing could only end up in disaster, and convert those subject to it into pathetic victims, as such of no much use to any organization[7].
Scientology critics are often confusing two different meanings of the word “brainwashing”, the first referred to techniques using drugs and physical violence in connection with “hypnosis”, and the second to religious indoctrination. The word used, “brainwashing”, is the same, but the meaning is different. Hubbard regards “brainwashing”, in the first meaning, as something very much real (but to be avoided and exposed). In the second meaning, on the other hand, “brainwashing” for Hubbard is just another false argument used by critics in order to assault Scientology and other religions.
Be it as it may be, is Hubbard in any sense the “author” of the “Manual” as published by Scientology in 1955? It is true that the text does include a reference to Dianetics, and paragraphs germane to Scientology’s well-known concerns about psychiatry in general. Goff and his organization, the Soldiers of the Cross, always maintained that the compiler was none else than Goff himself, on the basis of information acquired when he was a Communist[8]. It is also true that what seems to be the earliest Goff edition of the “Manual” has no date[9], and there is no conclusive evidence of whether it had been published before, or after, Scientology’s edition of 1955. On the other hand, several themes about Communist “conditioning” were developed in works by Goff certainly published before 1955[10].
The argument used by some Scientology critics, that Goff died in 1943 (and could not have known about later development, nor as a consequence could he have written the book), is simply wrong. Goff remained active in the US right-wing subculture until the early 1970s, and in fact died in 1972. Those concluding that Goff is the “author” of the book should, on the other hand, face the objection that the style of the “Manual” is more sophisticated if compared with the somewhat crude style of Goff’s earlier works.
Hubbard’s version is told in two technical bulletins of 13 and 19 December 1955. According to the second bulletin, “two manuscripts” were “left at the front desk [of our Phoenix office] with the request that they be mailed back to their owner” (i.e. “Charles Stickley”), and “we are not sure exactly from whom these came”. Subsequently, according to the first bulletin, “it was discovered that a book called Psychopolitics (spelled with a K) is in the Library of Congress. It is in German. It was written by a man called Paul Fadkeller, and was published in Berlin in 1947. Although I may be misinformed, Hubbard goes on to say, and definitely do not read German, this book [the “manual”] is probably the Russian translation”. In the second bulletin, Hubbard also refers that he “read it off onto a tape, compiling the two manuals, and removing from them some of their very verbose nomenclature”. He decided to publish the text for the benefit of the auditors who may face victims of brainwashing[11].
“Paul Fadkeller” is, in fact, neo-Kantian German philosopher Paul Feldkeller (1889-1972). His text “published in Berlin in 1947” [12], a copy of which is in fact at the Library of Congress in Washington D.C., shares with the “Manual” only the first part of the title and the use (but with a quite different meaning) of the word “psychopolitics”. Hubbard’s story, apart form any controversy, is compatible with those who said that he, in fact, read the text onto a tape.
How, however, can Hubbard’s and Goff’s stories be reconciled? Perhaps, both may be right and combining their versions is not impossible. If one compares the “Manual” with the respective works of Hubbard and Goff (obviously, two very different authors), in both cases the style and the ideas are quite different[13]. It may perhaps be possible to solve this problem by suggesting, on the basis of the US government’s and the CIA’s interest in brainwashing in general in the 1950s, that the text was compiled by some governmental agency of the on the basis of a variety of sources (Soviet and US Communist documents, texts on psychopolitics in general, exposes of brainwashing allegedly practiced by both Nazis and Communists). This agency would then have sent the text more or less anonymously to several different organizations (Scientology, Goff’s group, and perhaps others), with sentences which would have captured their attention (including, for Scientology, a specific reference to Dianetics), in the hope that they will publish it[14]. This would confirm both the interest in brainwashing by the CIA and other U.S. governmental agencies during the Cold War and their dissemination of false documents about “Communist brainwashing” through a variety of sources.
[1] Brain-Washing: A Synthesis of the Russian Textbook of Psychopolitics, Los Angeles : The American St. Hill Organization, 1955, p. 36.
[2] Ibid., pp. 32-33.
[3] On Goff see the entry “Kenneth Goff” in Jeffrey Kaplan, Encyclopedia of White Power. A Sourcebook on the Radical Racist Right, Walnut Creek-Lanham ( Maryland )- New York - Oxford : Altamira Press, 2000, pp. 120-122.
[4] See, for example, Kenneth Goff, This is My Story: Confessions of Stalin’s Agent, Englewood ( Colorado ): The Author, 1948; Idem, The Red Betrayal of Youth, Englewood ( Colorado ): by the Author, 1948; Idem, Strange Fire, Englewood (Colorado): The Author, 1954.
[5] In 1970, Morris Kominsky (1901-1975), a left-wing activist and one-time candidate of the US Communist Party for governor of Rhode Island (in 1938), published a book whose intent was to expose the pathological anti-communism of the American right (The Hoaxers: Plain Liars, Fancy Liars, and Damned Liars, Boston: Branden Press, 1970). There, at pages 537-586, Kominsky published a detailed analysis of the “Manual”, whose aim was to show that it could not have been written in the Soviet Union. Kominsky had no doubt that the author was Goff, and published (ibid., pp. 547-549) the text of an interview with Goff himself. Goff claimed to have distributed 1,000 mimeographed copies of the “Manual” certainly before 1955, and even offered a $500 reward for any information about the mysterious Mr. Stickley.
[6] See Bent Corydon - L. Ron Hubbard, Jr., L. Ron Hubbard: Messiah or Madman?, Lyle Stuart Inc., Secaucus (New Jersey) 1987, pp. 101-111.
[7] In another text by L.R. Hubbard, included in All About Radiation (Man’s Inhumanity to Man) by a nuclear physicist and a medical doctor, London : Hubbard Association of Scientologists International, 1957, pp. 62-63, brainwashing is again connected with “torture”, and it is stated that the Soviets knew it since 1927-1928. It is also noted that “brainwashing was attempted on Mindzensky [sic]. It didn’t work but, for a moment, he quivered and wavered at his trial” – a reference to Roman Catholic Hungarian Cardinal József Mindszenty (1892-1975). In a technical bulletin of July 22, 1956, Hubbard wrote that “We can brainwash faster that the Russians. 20 secs to total amnesia against three years to slightly confused loyalty” (Idem., The Technical Bulletins of Dianetics and Scientology. Vol. II, 1954-1956, reprint, Copenhagen - Los Angeles : Scientology Publications, 1986, p. 474). The context, however, is an invitation to Scientology auditors to keep a higher moral standard, according to which not all what is technically possible should be practiced. However, in this case also, the effect of brainwashing is “total amnesia”, confirming that Hubbard used the work “brainwashing” with a meaning different from the prevailing literature of that time (“total amnesia” being something different from the conversion to new ideas).
[8] See Colonel Gordon “Jack” Mohr, “Editorial’s Note”, in the version he edited of Brain-Washing (Mind-Changing). A Synthesis of a Russian Textbook on Mass Mind-Control (Psychopolitics), Phoenix (Arizona): Lord’s Covenant Church-America’s Promise Broadcasts, 1982, pp. 4-5. Mohr, who was close to Goff for several years and part of the same subculture, is still certain to this date that “Hubbard did not write the book” (letter by G.J. Mohr to M. Introvigne, June 5, 2001).
[9] See K. Goff, Brainwashing. A Synthesis of the Russian Textbook on Psychopolitics, Englewood (Colorado): Kenneth Goff, n.d.
[10] See for example K. Goff, This is My Story. Confessions of Stalin’s Agent, op. cit.
[11] L. Ron Hubbard, The Technical Bulletins of Dianetics and Scientology. Volume II: 1954-1956, reprint, op. cit., pp. 309-310 and pp. 312-313. In Corydon’s book, L. Ron Hubbard: Messiah or Madman?, op. cit., p. 103, there is an allusion to the Feldkeller reference as follows: “Ron Jr.: (…) Years later, they [the Scientologists] snuck it into the Library of Congress, and somebody else came by, and said ‘Oh, look, it was found in the Library of Congress!’, which is a lot of baloney”. The problem here, however, is that the Library of Congress does not own either the Scientology or the Goff version of the “Manual”. It owns, on the other hand, the work by Feldkeller, quite well-known by the scholars of this German philosopher, and by no means “snuck” by Scientologists into the Library.
[12] See also Idem., Psycho-Politik. Zur Demokratisierung, politischen Erziehung und Säuberung, Berlin : Chronos-Verlag, 1947, where at pp. 106-110 there is a definition of “Psychopolitics”, quite different from the one found in the “Manual”.
[13] Some have remarked that «pain-drug hypnosis» and at least one other expression, «thinkingness,» are only found in the «Manual» and in Scientology publications. «Pain-drug hypnosis» is mentioned only in the «Manual,» in Scientology works, and in Goff (after the 1950s): but did Hubbard and Goff derived it from the «Manual» or viceversa? For «thinkingness,» however, there are pre-Hubbard precedents. On the other hand, L. R. Hubbard's position on hypnosis in his 1951 Science of Survival. Simplified, Faster Dianetic Techniques (Hubbard Dianetic Foundation, Wichita 1951, pp. 223-224) was the exact opposite of the Manual's: «an individual in an hypnotic trance will rarely perform an immoral act even though commanded to do so by the hypnotist, unless that individual would normally perform such acts.»
[14] The argument on which Hubbard's critics insist, that having received the tract from the Church of Scientology, the FBI suspected its authenticity, is not very telling, for often the FBI was not kept informed of CIA or military services projects in this or other fields.

Lies on the Members only site

Read the below data -

National Campaigns - David Marston - NC has been asked by HQ to coordinate Knights Party media campaigns and to work on behalf of HQ directly with associates. As it states in the Knights Party Handbook (available to Knights - this outlines our third party strategy - if you have ever wondered why we don't run candidates you need to get this handbook) the first and most important aspect of any political campaign is name recognition and a solidifying of our beliefs among the general public.

There is no David Marston. His real name is David Barnett. Yes, once again the Knights' Party lies about members who don't exist. David is some middle age man who spends all his free time hanging out with boy scouts in North Carolina.

Randy Gray shows a sign of mental illness on ANSWP radio

http://youtube.com/watch?v=H280kApBhn0

Yes people, this is the Klan of today. This is the "leadership" of the Knights' Party. Listen and laugh until you cry.

Back in 08

I am sorry I've been slow with updating this site. Don't worry, we will expose the Knights' Party in 08 just as much as we did in 07. Thanks for all the feedback. I knew people would enjoy this site however, I never saw the overall fan base being as strong as it was. Thanks for all the help to those out that who sent information to us.

Five Lies at www.kkk.com: Part II

1-It has long been the belief of Pastor Robb that the Klan needed to get back into the political scene.


Really? Robb has been in charge since 1989. Can he provide a list of all his members who have ran for public office? I can answer that for you. No. His group is nothing more than a mailing list of suckers who donate to him monthly.


2- A. Become the leader of the White racialist movement
Through a strong organized show of leadership


Yes, the drunks like Bobby Malick and Andy Haskins. What a "strong" leadership they are.


3-Unit Recruiter - A Man or woman who has obtained the rank of Knight can apply by way of application to be a unit recruiter. A minimum of a high school diploma or G.E.D. is required.


Explain Randy Gray then.(high school drop out)


4- The highest rank is that of Knight . Not everyone seeks to earn that position as it is reserved for only the most dedicated and loyal.


Cough, cough. Actually, you buy and pay for your rank as you go.


5- Mr. Robb has been a powerful spokesman the past 30 years for the white rights movement.


What has Robb done in the past 10-15 years? Ask yourself the following -

1) Where was Robb at speaking out against the Jena 6?

2) Where was Robb at in Knoxville?

3) Where was Robb at during the Norfolk attack?

4) Where was Robb at during the Tony Finch trial?

He was too busy doing nothing. What a "leader".

Knights' Party - Making people pay for information

Take a look at this http://www.christianconcepts.net/information_pack_contains.htm. The Knights' Party charge $5.00 for "information". Nearly 90% of this same crap can be found at their website. What a scam!!

Most groups will send you information for free. Look at the ANSWP for instance. They send people free magazines for free. And no, not a back cover like the Knights' Party who charges for a back cover. They will send you an entire magazine for free. I recently wrote the BOK and they too sent me a free information packet. If those two groups can do that, why can't the Knights' Party?

They are "America's Largest Pro-White" group as they claim. They should have tons of money to send free sample copies then. Then again, we know all of that to be lies. What another Jewish rip off by these con-men.